Management of educational assessment in high school: transcendental factors

Keywords: management, educational assessment, senior high school, province


The purpose of this study is to examine the management of educational assessment taking into account several transcendental factors. Identification of transcendental factors arises from the context of the study based on the framework of public management and educational management. The research is focused on the weaknesses and strengths of data on the achievement of the educational standards, namely the educational assessment standard. Methodology: Concurrent triangulation design is used to examine the phenomenon of research. The Education Quality Assurance Institute contributed to this study in the form of secondary data on the report quality of education. Measures concerning eight National Education Standards are based on indicators in school self-evaluation instruments. Quality report card grades on the assessment standards are analyzed to obtain a frequency distribution consisting of standard deviations and average scores. The focuse group was set up to confirm satisfaction with the educational assessment services. The Miles-Huberman model is used as a qualitative data analysis procedure and processed using the ATLAS.ti software version 8. The research findings show that the factors of educational leadership, public service motivation, goal clarity, and commitment to values greatly influence the management of assessment in high schools in Central Java.

JEL Classification: A21, I28.

Author Biographies

Moh. Zamili, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

doctoral candidate at the Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Lecturer at the Tarbiyah Faculty of the Universita Ibrahimy Situbondo; Editor-in-Chief of Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Indonesia at Universitas Ibrahimy; Member of the Indonesian Qualitative Research Association (IQRA) and Asosiasi Dosen Pendidikan Agama Islam Indonesia (ADPISI).

Sri Suwitri, Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Central Java, Indonesia

Professor at the Faculty of Social and Political Science; researcher on public policies and combating corruption in Indonesia (an attempt at bureaucratic reform)

Ida Hayu Dwimawanti, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

Lecturer at the Faculty of Social and Political Science; researcher on national assessment at school

Kismartini Kismartini, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia

Lecturer at the Faculty of Social and Political Science; researcher on public administration and public services


Amirrachman, A., Syafi’i, S. and Welch, A. (2013), “Decentralising Indonesian Education: The Promise and the Price”, World Studies in Education, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 31-53, available at: (Accessed 10 January 2020), DOI: 10.7459/wse/09.1.03

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J. and Wittrock, M. C. (2001), A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Abridged Edition, Longmans.

Arnott, M. A. (2000), “Restructuring the Governance of Schools: the impact of managerialism on schools in Scotland and England”, in M. A. Arnott and C. D. Raab (Eds.), The Governance of Schooling: comparative studies of devolved management, pp. 43-63, Routledge.

Bandur, A. (2012), “Decentralization and School-Based Management in Indonesia”, Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Development, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 33-47, available at: (Accessed 10 January 2020), DOI: 10.6228/APJED.01.01.04

Bjork, C. (2004), “Decentralisation in education, institutional culture and teacher autonomy in Indonesia”, International Review of Education, Vol. 50, Issue 3-4, pp. 245-262, available at: (Accessed 10 January 2020), DOI: 10.1007/s11159-004-2622-6

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. and Wiliam, D. (2005), Assessment for learning Putting it into practice, Open University Press.

Black, P. and Wiliam, D. (2006), “Assessment for Learning in the Classroom”, in J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and Learning, 1st ed., pp. 9-26, Sage.

Bloom, B. S. (1956), Taxonomy Of Educational Objectives, The Classification of Educational Goals: Handbook 1 Cognitive Domain, Longmans.

Bryman, A. (2006), “Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How is it Done?”, Qualitative Research, Vol. 6, Issue 1, pp. 97-113, available at: (Accessed 10 January 2020), DOI: 10.1177/1468794106058877

Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M., Alessandri, G., Gerbino, M. and Barbaranelli, C. (2011), “The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: A longitudinal study”, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 81, Issue 1, pp. 78-96, available at: (Accessed 10 January 2020), DOI: 10.1348/2044-8279.002004

Certo, S. and Certo, T. (2016), Modern Management: Concepts and Skills, 14th ed., Pearson.

Christ, O., Sibley, C. G. and Wagner, U. (2011), “Multilevel Modeling in Personality and Social Psychology”, in K. Deaux and M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, 3rd ed., pp. 239-260, Oxford University Press.

Clarke, M. (2011), Framework for Building an Effective Student Assessment System, The World Bank Group, available at: (Accessed 10 January 2020).

Conley, D. T. and Darling-Hammond, L. (2013), Creating Systems of Assessment for Deeper Learning, Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.

Corcoran, R. and Tormey, R. (2010), “Teacher education, emotional competencies and development education”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 2, Issue 2, pp. 2448-2457, available at: (Accessed 11 January 2020), DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.352

Creswell, J. W. (2012), Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 4th ed., Pearson Education, Inc.

Creswell, J. W. and Clark, V. L. P. (2011), Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Sage.

Creswell, J. W. and Creswell, J. D. (2018), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed., Sage.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2004), “Inequality and the Right to Learn: Access to Qualified Teachers in California’s Public Schools”, Teachers College Record, Vol. 106, Issue 10, pp. 1936-1966, available at: (Accessed 11 January 2020).

Drake, S. M. and Burns, R. C. (2004), Meeting standards through integrated curriculum, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Earl, L. M. (2013), Assessment As Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximize Student Learning, 2nd ed., Corwin A SAGE Company.

Ferrer, G. (2006), Educational Assessment Systems in Latin America: Current Practice and Future Challenges, Partnership for Educational Revitalization in the Americas (PREAL).

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A. and Creswell, J. W. (2013), “Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs-Principles and Practices”, HSR: Health Services Research, Vol. 48, Issue 6pt2, pp. 2134-2156, available at: (Accessed 11 January 2020), DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Fusarelli, L. D. and Johnson, B. (2004), “Educational governance and the new public management”, Public Administration and Management, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 118-127.

Gardner, H. (2011), Frames of Mind The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Basic Books.

Gil-Olarte Márquez, P., Palomera Martín, R. and Brackett, M. A. (2006), “Relating emotional intelligence to social competence and academic achievement in high school students”, Psicothema, Vol. 18 (supl), pp. 118-123, available at: (Accessed 11 January 2020).

Goleman, D. (2000), Working with Emotional Intelligence, Bantam.

Goleman, D. (2009), Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ, Bloomsbury.

Gulick, L. and Urwick, L. (2003), Papers on the Science of Administration: the Early Sociology of Management and Organizations, in K. Thompson (ed.), Routledge.

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J. and Kirschner, P. A. (2004), “A Five-Dimensional Framework for Authentic Assessment”, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 52, Issue 3, pp. 67-86, available at: (Accessed 11 January 2020), DOI: 10.1007/BF02504676

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J. and Kirschner, P. A. (2006), “Authentic Assessment, Student and Teacher Perceptions: the Practical Value of the Five Dimensional-Framework”, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, Vol. 58, pp. 337-357, available at: (Accessed 11 January 2020), DOI: 10.1080/13636820600955443

Heyward, M. O., Cannon, R. A. and Sarjono. (2011), “Implementing school-based management in Indonesia: Impact and lessons learned”, Journal of Development Effectiveness, Vol. 3, Issue 3, pp. 371-388, available at: (Accessed 11 January 2020), DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2011.568122

Hodgson, A. and Spours, K. (2002), “Key skills for all? The key skills qualification and Curriculum 2000”, Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 17, Issue 1, pp. 29-47, available at: (Accessed 12 January 2020), DOI: 10.1080/02680930110100045

Johnson, B. and Turner, L. A. (2003), “Data Collection Strategies in Mixed Methods Research”, in A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Method in Social and Behavioral Research, 1st ed., pp. 297-319, Sage.

Kemendikbud (2017), Panduan Implementasi Keterampilan Abad 21: Kurikulum 2013 di SMA, Kemendikbud (in Indonesian).

Kemper, E. A., Stringfield, S. and Teddlie, C. (2010), “Mixed Methods Sampling Strategies in Social Science Research”, in A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research, pp. 273-296, Sage.

Koontz, H. and O’donnell, C. (1976), Principles of Management: An Analysis of Managerial Functions, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002), “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview”, Theory Into Practice, Vol. 41, Issue 4, pp. 212-218, available at: (Accessed 12 January 2020), DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Mertens, D. M. (2010), Research and evaluation in education and psychology: integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods, 3rd ed., Sage.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. and Saldaña, J. (2014), Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed., Sage.

Morse, J. M. (2003), “Principles of Mixed Methods and Multimethod Research Design”, in A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Method in Social and Behavioral Research, 1st ed., Sage.

Mueller, J. (2005), “The Authentic Assessment Toolbox: Enhancing Student Learning through Online Faculty Development”, Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, Vol. 1, Issue 1, available at: (Accessed 12 January 2020).

Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Prasojo, L. D., Idi, A. and Hamidah, A. (2019), “Curriculum Reform in Indonesia: Moving from an Exclusive to Inclusive Curriculum”, Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 53-72, available at: (Accessed 12 January 2020), DOI: 10.26529/cepsj.543

Mutch, C. (2012), “Assessment for, of and as learning: Developing a sustainable assessment culture in New Zealand schools”, Policy Futures in Education, Vol. 10, Issue 4, pp. 374-385, available at: (Accessed 12 January 2020), DOI: 10.2304/pfie.2012.10.4.374

NPD.Kemendikbud (2019), Kualifikasi Guru SMA di Jawa Timur, Jawa Tengah, dan Jawa Barat, Data Kualifikasi Guru, available at: (Accessed 12 January 2020), (in Indonesian).

P21 Framework for 21st-century learning (2009), Framework for 21st Century Learning, P21 Partnership for 21st Century Learning, available at: (Accessed 12 January 2020).

Pandey, S. K. and Rainey, H. G. (2007), “Public Managers’ Perceptions of Organizational Goal Ambiguity: Analyzing Alternative Models”, International Public Management Journal, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 85-112, available at: (Accessed 12 January 2020), DOI: 10.1080/10967490600766953

Pandey, S. K. and Stazyk, E. C. (2008), “Antecedents and Correlates of Public Service Motivation”, in J. L. Perry and A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in public Management, pp. 101-117, Oxford University Press.

Pandey, S. K. and Wright, B. E. (2006), “Connecting the Dots in Public Management: Political Environment, Organizational Goal Ambiguity, and the Public Manager’s Role Ambiguity”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 16, Issue 4, 511-532, available at: (Accessed 12 January 2020), DOI: 10.1093/jopart/muj006

Patrinos, H. A., Barrera-Osorio, F. and Fasih, T. (2009), Decentralized Decision-Making in Schools: The Theory and Evidence on School-Based Management, The World Bank, available at: (Accessed 13 January 2020), DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-7969-1

Pecheone, R., Morris, T., Daro, V., Krauss, S. and Steinberg, A. (2018), “Redesigning Assessment Systems: Emerging Lessons from Three States”, Jobs for the Future, available at: (Accessed 13 January 2020).

Pellegrino, J., Chudowsky, N. and Glaser, R. (2001), Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment, National Academy Press.

Pellegrino, J. W. (2014), “Assessment as a Positive Influence on 21st Century Teaching and Learning: A Systems Approach to Progress James”, Psicología Educativa, Vol. 20, Issue 2, pp. 65-77, available at: (Accessed 13 January 2020), DOI: 10.1016/j.pse.2014.11.002

Pellegrino, J. W. (2009), “The Design of an Assessment System for the Race to the Top: A Learning Sciences Perspective on Issues of Growth and Measurement”, Exploratory Seminar: Measurement Challenges Within the Race to the Top Agenda, Center for K – 12 Assessment and Performance Mana, pp. 3-37.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2013 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan, (2013), (testimony of Peraturan.Pemerintah), (in Indonesian).

Perry, J. L. and Hondeghem, A. (2008), “Editors’ Introduction”, in J. L. Perry and A. Hondeghem (Eds.), Motivation in public Management: the call of public service, pp. 1-14, Oxford University Press.

Perry, J. L., Hondeghem, A. and Wise, L. R. (2010), “Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: Twenty years of research and an Agenda for the future”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 70, Issue 5, pp. 681-690, available at: (Accessed 13 January 2020), DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02196.x

Perry, J. L. and Porter, L. W. (1982), “Factors Affecting the Context for Motivation in Public Organizations”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 7, Issue 1, pp. 89-98, available at: (Accessed 13 January 2020), DOI: 10.2307/257252.

Perry, J. L. and Wise, L. R. (1990), “The Motivational Bases of Public Service”, Public Administration Review, Vol. 50, Issue 3, pp. 367-373, available at: (Accessed 13 January 2020), DOI: 10.2307/976618

PISA (2018), PISA 2018: Result in Focus, OECD.

Popham, W. J. (2001), The Truth About Testing: An Educator’s Call to Action, ASCD.

Pratiwi, I. (2019), “PISA Effect on Curriculum In Indonesia”, Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, Vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 51-71, available at: (Accessed 13 January 2020), (in Indonesian), DOI: 10.24832/jpnk.V4i1.1157

Puspendik.kemdikbud (2019), Sejarah Ujian Nasional, Ujian Nasional, (in Indonesian).

Raihani, R. (2007), “Education reforms in Indonesia in the Twenty-First Century”, International Education Journal, Vol. 8, Issue 1, pp. 172-183, available at: (Accessed 13 January 2020).

Rizqi, A. N. (2019), “23 Sekolah di Jateng jadi Percontohan Pendidikan Antikorupsi”, Semarang Bisnis, available at: (Accessed 13 January 2020), (in Indonesian).

Robbins, S. P. and Coulter, M. (2018), Management, 14th ed., Pearson.

Sandelowski, M. (2000), “Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Sampling, Data Collection, and Analysis Techniques in Mixed-Method Studies”, Research in Nursing and Health, Vol. 23, Issue 3, pp. 246-255, available at:<246::aid-nur9>;2-h (Accessed 14 January 2020), DOI: 10.1002/1098-240x(200006)23:3<246::aid-nur9>;2-h

Setiadi, H. (2016), “Pelaksanaan Penilaian Pada Kurikulum 2013”, Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, Vol. 20, Issue 2, pp. 166-178, available at: (Accessed 14 January 2020), (in Indonesian), DOI: 10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Teddlie, C. and Yu, F. (2007), “Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples”, Journal of Mixed Methods Research, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 77-100, available at: (Accessed 14 January 2020), DOI: 10.1177/2345678906292430

Terry, G. R. and Franklin, S. G. (2000), Principles of Management, AITBS.

Thompson, D., Bell, T., Andreae, P. and Robins, A. (2013), “The role of teachers in implementing curriculum changes”, SIGCSE 2013, Proceedings of the 44th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 245-250, available at: (Accessed 15 January 2020), DOI: 10.1145/2445196.2445272

Trilling, B. and Fadel, C. (2009), 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times, Jossey-Bass.

Wiliam, D. (2009), Assessment for Learning: Why, What and How?, Institute of Education, University of London.

Wright, B. E., Moynihan, D. P. and Pandey, S. K. (2012), “Pulling the Levers: Transformational Leadership, Public Service Motivation, and Mission Valence” Public Administration Review, Vol. 72, Issue 2, pp. 206-215, available at: (Accessed 15 January 2020), DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02496.x

Wyatt-Smith, C. and Cumming, J. J. (2009), Educational Assessment in the 21st Century: Connecting Theory and Practice, Springer Netherlands, available at: (Accessed 15 January 2020), DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9964-9

Yukl, G. A. (2010), Leadership in Organizations, 7th ed., Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Yukl, G. A. and Lepsinger, R. (2004), Flexible Leadership: Creating Value By Balancing Multiple Challenges and Choice, Jossey-Bass.
How to Cite
Zamili, M., Suwitri, S., Dwimawanti, I. H. and Kismartini, K. (2020) “Management of educational assessment in high school: transcendental factors”, Management and Entrepreneurship: Trends of Development, 1(11), pp. 81-97. doi: